Elsevier

Journal of Surgical Education

Volume 75, Issue 6, November–December 2018, Pages 1441-1451
Journal of Surgical Education

ORIGINAL REPORTS
Resident Vitality in 34 Programs at 14 Academic Health Systems: Insights for Educating Physicians and Surgeons for the Future

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.04.021Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

OBJECTIVE

To clarify our understanding of how the culture of residency training influences the well-being of residents, this study reports on the vitality of residents at 34 programs across the United States and identifies characteristics of the programs, institutions and residents that are associated with high resident vitality.

DESIGN

In 2014 to 2015, residents nationally were surveyed using the validated C - Change Resident Survey. The survey assessed residents’ vitality and 12 other dimensions that characterize residents’ perspectives of the culture of the residency training programs: Self-efficacy, Institutional/program support, Relationships/inclusion/trust, Values alignment, Ethical/moral distress, Respect, Leadership aspirations, Mentoring, Work-life integration, Gender equity, Racial/ethnic minority equity, and self-assessed Competencies. Multilevel models were used to assess vitality within and across programs, and examine predictors including resident, program, and institution characteristics.

PARTICIPANTS

Two thousand four hundred and fifty-two residents from 11 General Surgery, 12 Internal Medicine, and 11 Pediatrics programs at 14 U.S. academic health systems.

RESULTS

One thousand seven hundred and eight residents responded (70% response rate). The mean Vitality score was 3.6 (range 1–5, where values of 4–5 represent high Vitality). There was wide variation among the 34 programs in the percent of residents who had high Vitality scores, ranging from 17% to 71%. However, the average Vitality scores within specialty (Surgery, Medicine, and Pediatrics) were not significantly different. The strongest predictors of Vitality were Work-life integration, Relationships/inclusion/trust, Institutional/program support, Res?>pect, Values alignment, and Ethical/moral distress, which together accounted for 50% of vitality variance. Individual demographics accounted for just 3% of variance.

CONCLUSIONS

Vitality is an essential component of resident well-being, and within each specialty there are programs that have excelled in promoting a culture of high vitality. Our findings suggest that we should test interventions to enhance resident vitality by focusing greater attention on providing institutional support, aligning individual and institutional values, integrating work and personal life, and facilitating relationships, inclusiveness and trust.

KEY WORDS

Residents
Culture of medicine
Vitality
Clinical learning environment
Resident well-being

Abbreviations

CRS C
Change Resident Survey
RI
Relationship, inclusion and trust
IS
Institutional/program support
VA
Values alignment
EMD
Ethical/moral distress
WLI
Work life integration
URMM
Underrepresented in medicine minority
PGY
Post graduate year
ACGME
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education
IMG
International medical graduate
LGBTQ
lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, questioning
HLM
hierarchical linear modeling

Competencies

Practice-Based Learning and Improvement
Patient Care
, Systems-Based Practice
Medical Knowledge
Interpersonal and Communication Skills
Professionalism

Cited by (0)

Funding: This work was supported by the Arnold P. Gold Foundation with supplemental funds from the Committee of Interns and Residents (CIR), the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Boston Medical Center, and Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine.